Review economics
doocs/source-code-hunter
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.6× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
4
Attributed PRs
96
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 4
#187 chore: upgrade GitHub Actions to latest versions
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#186 fix: patch esbuild path traversal vulnerability (Dependabot #24)
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#185 chore: upgrade pnpm to v11 and refresh dependencies
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#184 Patch vulnerable transitive dependencies in the VitePress docs stack
1 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 135 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Cursor agent, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read doocs/source-code-hunter weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on doocs/source-code-hunter — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository