Review economics
dontbesilent2025/dbskill
Read from the 5 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥57%
Attributed
a floor
4
Attributed PRs
1
Other PRs
5
Read
Attributed — the latest 4
#12 fix: harden record-demo.sh against sed injection and brittle ls parsing
0 reviews · 7.4d to merge
#11 fix: replace broken /文风分析 skill reference in dbs-ai-check
0 reviews · 7.4d to merge
#10 docs: 更新 demo 录屏为上游 repo
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#9 feat: Claude Code 插件市场支持（一键安装 + 自动更新）
0 reviews · 5h to merge
The rest — the latest 1
How this was measured
57% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read dontbesilent2025/dbskill weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on dontbesilent2025/dbskill — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository