Review economics

elastic/elasticsearch

Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·

Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.

≥1%

Attributed

a floor

0

Attributed PRs

100

Other PRs

100

Read

How this was measured

1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 94777 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.

Detected: Cursor agent, Claude Code.

“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits

XLinkedInHacker News
Review tax badge for elastic/elasticsearch

The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.

Tell me when this moves

We re-read elastic/elasticsearch weekly and email only when the number changes materially.

Read your own repos

This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.

npx @ambera/review-tax

Want this continuously on elastic/elasticsearch — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge

Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository