Review economics

go-gitea/gitea

Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·

Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 2.3× the reviews submitted of the rest.

≥11%

Attributed

a floor

8

Attributed PRs

92

Other PRs

100

Read

Per pull requestAttributedRestRatio
Review rounds0.00.10.0×
Reviews submitted11.34.92.3×
Commits after first review7.44.51.6×
Reverts0.30.05.8×
Time to merge9.0d11.6d0.8×

How this was measured

11% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 19603 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.

Detected: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent, OpenAI Codex.

“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits

XLinkedInHacker News
Review tax badge for go-gitea/gitea

The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.

Tell me when this moves

We re-read go-gitea/gitea weekly and email only when the number changes materially.

Read your own repos

This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.

npx @ambera/review-tax

Want this continuously on go-gitea/gitea — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge

Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository