Review economics
davisking/dlib
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#3145 Add dependency-free ONNX export for DNNs
2 reviews · 76.1d to merge
#3154 Allow setting sockstreambuf buffer size and max putback
4 reviews · 2.8d to merge
#3152 Added support for unix sockets
1 reviews · 10.2d to merge
#3151 This version of cmake we were using is now broken in github actions. …
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#3150 Workaround for missing typename compiler error
0 reviews · 6h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 626 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, Google Jules.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read davisking/dlib weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on davisking/dlib — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository