Review economics
datawhalechina/easy-vibe
Read from the 55 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥5%
Attributed
a floor
2
Attributed PRs
53
Other PRs
55
Read
Attributed — the latest 2
The rest — the latest 5
#123 feat: add localization checker and Korean translation guides
0 reviews · 44h to merge
#124 docs: refresh MiniMax-M3 context window and input modalities across locales
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#119 docs: add UIZZE to UI reference sites
0 reviews · 15.7d to merge
#110 docs: mirror MiniMax-M3 update across remaining 8 locales
0 reviews · 55.5d to merge
#109 fix: 修正上下文窗口定义（包含输入 + 输出，非仅输入）
0 reviews · 2h to merge
How this was measured
5% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read datawhalechina/easy-vibe weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on datawhalechina/easy-vibe — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository