Review economics
cyfdecyf/cow
Read from the 18 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
18
Other PRs
18
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#558 Do not add Content-Length to 304 and 206 http response
0 reviews · 61.0d to merge
#458 Fix conn reset handling for go 1.6.1
0 reviews · 6.8d to merge
#338 add support for change stat file position in config
0 reviews · 18h to merge
#326 install script: improve detect arm without vfp
0 reviews · 36h to merge
#323 support relaunching cow on SIGUSR1
0 reviews · 2.8d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read cyfdecyf/cow weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on cyfdecyf/cow — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository