Review economics
crossoverJie/cim
Read from the 67 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.2× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥6%
Attributed
a floor
5
Attributed PRs
62
Other PRs
67
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#182 feat: add Checkstyle code style checking
7 reviews · 1h to merge
#185 Handle NumberFormatException in UserInfoCacheServiceImpl.onlineUser()
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#184 Sync with feature/add-checkstyle-code-style branch
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#183 Enable GitHub Actions for stacked PRs
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#169 feat: Support allin1 docker image
1 reviews · 1h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#188 test: add unit tests for cim-common module
2 reviews · 3.5d to merge
#187 build(deps): bump org.apache.zookeeper:zookeeper from 3.8.4 to 3.8.6
0 reviews · 15h to merge
#181 Change guava to caffeine
11 reviews · 2.6d to merge
#177 build(deps): bump com.squareup.okhttp3:okhttp from 3.3.1 to 4.9.2
0 reviews · 10h to merge
#178 test: add Via header field to RpcProxyManager test DTO
1 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
6% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read crossoverJie/cim weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on crossoverJie/cim — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository