Review economics
coollabsio/coolify
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#11119 feat(ui): Shadow UI redesign, domain management, and DNS autoconfigure
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#11040 fix(compose): normalize service-name keys for domains and env vars
0 reviews · 10.2d to merge
#11000 feat(mcp): add resource diagnostics and deployment controls
3 reviews · 13.0d to merge
#11028 fix(backups): pin a single bracket-free IP for mc --resolve
0 reviews · 10.5d to merge
#11061 fix(backups): pin all resolved addresses in one CURLOPT_RESOLVE entry
0 reviews · 6.8d to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 2676 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read coollabsio/coolify weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on coollabsio/coolify — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository