Review economics
coaidev/coai
Read from the 35 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
35
Other PRs
35
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#214 chore: Compatible with pre-modified SMTP sending method (#174)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#350 主题切换显示逻辑修改
1 reviews · 48h to merge
#355 fix: Overflow-hidden属性使思考块超出部分文字无法正常显示
1 reviews · 27h to merge
#335 style: add Math Preprocessing for Markdown Component
1 reviews · 10h to merge
#326 Fix(Chat):修复带有reasoning_content信息看不到回答内容的问题
1 reviews · 4h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read coaidev/coai weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on coaidev/coai — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository