Review economics
cft0808/edict
Read from the 32 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.0× the commits after first review of the rest.
≥8%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
29
Other PRs
32
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#313 ci(deps): bump docker/login-action from 3 to 4
0 reviews · 2.0d to merge
#312 ci(deps): bump docker/metadata-action from 5 to 6
0 reviews · 2.0d to merge
#311 ci(deps): bump docker/setup-qemu-action from 3 to 4
0 reviews · 2.0d to merge
#310 ci(deps): bump actions/setup-python from 5 to 6
0 reviews · 2.0d to merge
#306 fix(skills): remove broken default skills hub
0 reviews · 2.3d to merge
How this was measured
8% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read cft0808/edict weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on cft0808/edict — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository