Review economics
blueimp/JavaScript-Load-Image
Read from the 17 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
17
Other PRs
17
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#111 Uncaught exceptions aren't catched or rejected
10 reviews · 17h to merge
#100 Compatibility with jQuery 3.5.0
0 reviews · 7h to merge
#89 Add an IPTC parser
1 reviews · 3.9d to merge
#88 Optimisation for thumbnail
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#86 Fix import from Node environment (to not break in server side rendering)
0 reviews · 9h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read blueimp/JavaScript-Load-Image weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on blueimp/JavaScript-Load-Image — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository