Review economics
blader/humanizer
Read from the 16 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.9× the time to merge of the rest.
≥18%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
13
Other PRs
16
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#84 fix: add content preservation rule and strengthen em dash handling
0 reviews · 52.9d to merge
#113 Add Detection Guidance: false positives, human-writing signs, LLM idiolects
0 reviews · 25.4d to merge
#121 Narrow Section 26 hyphen rule to drop only predicate-position cases
0 reviews · 4.8d to merge
#119 docs: clarify shared install path for OpenCode compatibility
0 reviews · 8.0d to merge
#77 Add minor fix for excessive usage of "actually" in chatbot output, Fixes #72
0 reviews · 34h to merge
How this was measured
18% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read blader/humanizer weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on blader/humanizer — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository