Review economics
bitwarden/server
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#8150 QA-2270: add OrganizationGroupScene to the seeder
3 reviews · 6h to merge
#8149 Extract Serilog file logging into Libraries/SerilogFileLogging
7 reviews · 5h to merge
#8146 [PM-41481] Fix policy enforcement when accepting invite link
8 reviews · 17h to merge
#8135 [PM-41451] Migrate Billing files off of `AssemblyHelpers.GetVersion()`
1 reviews · 30h to merge
#8145 [BRE-2158] Add PR label to _move_edd_db_scripts workflow
1 reviews · 18h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 5444 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read bitwarden/server weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on bitwarden/server — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository