Review economics
bilibili/ijkplayer
Read from the 35 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
35
Other PRs
35
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#5249 add ijklas demuxer & remove las features away from ijkplayer
0 reviews · 3.1d to merge
#5247 fix(config): move enable ijk* to the back of disable all
0 reviews · 25h to merge
#5171 fix(las): exits when error occurs
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#5142 fix(init-ios): fix the ffmpeg version in ios/android build scripts
1 reviews · 2.2d to merge
#5138 feat(las): support video_tool_box by adding side data
0 reviews · 3h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read bilibili/ijkplayer weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on bilibili/ijkplayer — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository