Review economics
avwo/whistle
Read from the 84 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.6× the time to merge of the rest.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
81
Other PRs
84
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#1343 fix: upgrade adm-zip to 0.6.0 (CVE-2026-39244)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#1341 fix: correct typo in access-control-allow-methods header name
0 reviews · 40h to merge
#1328 docs: fix Rewrite Response typo
0 reviews · 33h to merge
#1308 fix: add authorityKeyIdentifier extension to fix Python SSL verificat…
0 reviews · 18h to merge
#1247 chore: typo req-data.js
0 reviews · 4.5d to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read avwo/whistle weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on avwo/whistle — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository