Review economics
ashishpatel26/500-AI-Agents-Projects
Read from the 17 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.0× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥13%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
14
Other PRs
17
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#115 feat: add PII sanitization agent for autonomous AI pipelines
0 reviews · 70.5d to merge
#156 fix: replace broken star-history.com chart with a self-generated one
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#151 docs: fix clone-URL links and align contribution guide with actual agent layout
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#155 ci: auto-manage stale pull requests and issues
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#153 ci: require DCO sign-off on every pull request
1 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
13% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ashishpatel26/500-AI-Agents-Projects weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ashishpatel26/500-AI-Agents-Projects — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository