Review economics
apache/rocketmq
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.8× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥12%
Attributed
a floor
15
Attributed PRs
85
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#10469 [ISSUE #10467] Reduce per-message allocation in createUniqID and valueOfMagicCode
12 reviews · 22h to merge
#10493 [ISSUE #10492] Add debug logging for swallowed exceptions in StatsAllSubCommand
2 reviews · 2.7d to merge
#10507 [ISSUE #10216] Fix potential NPE in EscapeBridge when topicPublishInfo is null
3 reviews · 45h to merge
#10473 [ISSUE #10462] Improve error handling in tiered storage
5 reviews · 40h to merge
#10476 [ISSUE #10462] Fix resource leaks and lifecycle issues
2 reviews · 21h to merge
The rest — the latest 5
#10418 [ISSUE #10417][BUG] Fix stale minOffset after truncate
7 reviews · 21.0d to merge
#10714 [ISSUE #10713] Optimize ConsumerFilterManager register CPU consumption
3 reviews · 3.9d to merge
#10723 [ISSUE #10722] [Bug] Lite Topic may not be cleaned up when message store timestamp is unavailable
4 reviews · 2.8d to merge
#9655 [ISSUE #9654] Optimize the bufferLocal size of the TimerMessageStore
3 reviews · 334.8d to merge
#10715 [ISSUE #7703] Upgrade fastjson2 to 2.0.63 for security fixes
3 reviews · 23h to merge
How this was measured
12% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 6 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 2915 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read apache/rocketmq weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on apache/rocketmq — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository