Review economics
anthropics/financial-services
Read from the 40 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥92%
Attributed
a floor
38
Attributed PRs
2
Other PRs
40
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#307 manifest: add access_policies key and guided access-policies command
1 reviews · 16h to merge
#302 Add read-only add-in data export; harden cache-clear scripts
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#281 manifest: add gateway_auth_source=entra; new entra-app.md registration doc
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#268 Add sovereign / national cloud (GCC-High, DoD, 21Vianet) docs and graph_cloud validation
1 reviews · 21h to merge
#247 Add displayName to all marketplace plugin entries
3 reviews · 5.0d to merge
How this was measured
92% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read anthropics/financial-services weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on anthropics/financial-services — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository