Review economics
aniyomiorg/aniyomi
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#2368 fix: Move httpserver starting to service
1 reviews · 5.7d to merge
#2369 feat: Adapt tachiyomix 1.6 into extension-lib 17
1 reviews · 2.5d to merge
#2364 feat: Hide the blocking getTorrentInfo shim function
1 reviews · 3h to merge
#2361 feat: Fetch .torrent details without starting torrent server
2 reviews · 46h to merge
#2348 feat: Add an http server for use in extensions
0 reviews · 15h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 395 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Google Jules.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read aniyomiorg/aniyomi weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on aniyomiorg/aniyomi — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository