Review economics
andreamazz/AMScrollingNavbar
Read from the 71 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
71
Other PRs
71
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#401 Ensured that gesture delegate methods do not block gestural pop
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#400 Add option to scroll when search visible in nav bar
1 reviews · 5.7d to merge
#399 Hotfix for IOS 13 NavigationBar appearance issues
1 reviews · 42h to merge
#394 The back button text color changed from transparent to black.
0 reviews · 15h to merge
#392 UIKit-applied dimming bug fixed by duplicating tintColor value
1 reviews · 3.4d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read andreamazz/AMScrollingNavbar weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on andreamazz/AMScrollingNavbar — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository