Review economics
alireza0/s-ui
Read from the 73 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥0%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
73
Other PRs
73
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1217 chore(deps): bump sing-box to v1.13.15
0 reviews · 44h to merge
#1182 Fix Clash proxy group expansion
0 reviews · 3.2d to merge
#1181 Fix Shadowsocks 2022 user lookup
0 reviews · 3.2d to merge
#1151 fix(clash): inject default Proxy/Auto only when a custom group references them
2 reviews · 7h to merge
#1145 fix(sub): add content disposition header for subscriptions
1 reviews · 12h to merge
How this was measured
0% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read alireza0/s-ui weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on alireza0/s-ui — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository