Review economics
alin23/Lunar
Read from the 7 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
7
Other PRs
7
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#515 Add CLI install location to succcessful print statement
0 reviews · 8h to merge
#514 fix: bump platformio/espressif to 5.3.0 to maintain darwin_arm64 compatibility
0 reviews · 27h to merge
#436 Fix spelling
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#312 Add a Gitter chat badge to README.md
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#237 Fix installation instructions in README.md
0 reviews · 17h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read alin23/Lunar weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on alin23/Lunar — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository