Review economics
ahmedkhaleel2004/gitdiagram
Read from the 47 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
47
Other PRs
47
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#208 Bump the "all-dependencies" group with 2 updates across multiple ecosystems
0 reviews · 7h to merge
#207 fix: secure repository access and make browse indexing durable
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#206 Patch Next.js and Sharp security vulnerabilities
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#203 Bump the "all-dependencies" group with 1 update across multiple ecosystems
0 reviews · 2.4d to merge
#205 Tighten the mobile repo card layout
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 28 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ahmedkhaleel2004/gitdiagram weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ahmedkhaleel2004/gitdiagram — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository