Review economics
a2ui-project/a2ui
Read from the 99 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
0
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
99
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1990 Update a2ui_agent blueprint with refined APIs
28 reviews · 24.8d to merge
#2133 ci: add weekly antigravity code audit workflow
1 reviews · 5.9d to merge
#2021 docs: add glossary definitions for Catalog Transformer, A2UI Tag and etc.
2 reviews · 19.2d to merge
#1991 Update a2ui-core blueprint
29 reviews · 23.7d to merge
#2092 feat(eval): add agent-based iterative format optimization framework and history
13 reviews · 10.9d to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 99 of 1014 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Gemini CLI, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read a2ui-project/a2ui weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on a2ui-project/a2ui — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository