Review economics
ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#2160 feat: persist Agent Chat Skill selection by session
8 reviews · 33h to merge
#2126 fix: 优化客户端自选股详情、任务折叠与工作区空间 (#2115)
30 reviews · 7.2d to merge
#2165 ci: 并行分片后端离线测试
2 reviews · 3h to merge
#2157 feat: support Responses API model channels
30 reviews · 45h to merge
#2158 ci: accelerate selective test gates
18 reviews · 44h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 24 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 660 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ZhuLinsen/daily_stock_analysis — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository