Review economics
Yu9191/wloc
Read from the 9 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥50%
Attributed
a floor
4
Attributed PRs
5
Other PRs
9
Read
Attributed — the latest 4
The rest — the latest 5
#20 feat(worker): 苹果地图链接(中国大陆 GCJ-02)也转 WGS84，与高德对齐(境外自动跳过)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#19 fix(stash): 修stash配置
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#18 docs: 订阅地址新增 Shadowrocket(小火箭)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#17 修复(shadowrocket): 改用纯字符串查询解析器 + 新增小火箭模块
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#16 fix(stash): use script-providers + binary-mode for Stash override
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
50% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Devin.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Yu9191/wloc weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Yu9191/wloc — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository