Review economics
YishenTu/claudian
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#1050 feat: add dual-pane session management
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#1045 fix: read the basename from either path separator in the file-naming lint rule
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#1048 refactor: remove unnecessary privileged access
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#1047 fix: preserve Pi transcript history on session reset
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#1042 fix: don't resolve npm's POSIX sh shim as the Claude CLI on Windows
0 reviews · 3h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 308 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read YishenTu/claudian weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on YishenTu/claudian — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository