Review economics
XiaoMi/soar
Read from the 55 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
55
Other PRs
55
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#318 fix RuleStringConcatenation FUN.003
0 reviews · 37.0d to merge
#297 新增配置项用于控制是否允许测试数据库版本小于线上数据库
0 reviews · 204.2d to merge
#290 fix typo of DSN config in config.go
0 reviews · 210.3d to merge
#295 alter table 修改字符集用convert to
0 reviews · 70.1d to merge
#294 fix bug of time parse by CleanupTestDatabase
0 reviews · 84.1d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read XiaoMi/soar weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on XiaoMi/soar — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository