Review economics
ValdikSS/GoodbyeDPI
Read from the 26 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
26
Other PRs
26
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#830 Fix grammar error in README and YAML syntax errors in workflow
0 reviews · 35.2d to merge
#817 Fixed missing newline
0 reviews · 14.6d to merge
#665 Add TLS ClientHello fake packet generator
0 reviews · 10.1d to merge
#713 Adds a clearer description
0 reviews · 21.3d to merge
#706 Update README.md, fix a typo (QUIC -> QUIK as trading software, not protocol)
0 reviews · 2h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read ValdikSS/GoodbyeDPI weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on ValdikSS/GoodbyeDPI — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository