Review economics
Tencent/Shadow
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1429 fix(core.loader): 修复容器 authority 和插件 authority 相同时返回错误 Uri 的问题
2 reviews · 2.3d to merge
#1428 feat(core.runtime): 支持Content Provider多authority功能
1 reviews · 13h to merge
#1426 feat(core.runtime): 支持Content Provider设置multiprocess="true"
1 reviews · 34h to merge
#1425 fix(core.gradle-plugin): 修复在 Windows 平台连续 gradle clean 打包失败的问题
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#1417 进一步兼容 AGP 8.9.0
1 round · 7 reviews · 16.5d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 277 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Tencent/Shadow weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Tencent/Shadow — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository