Review economics
Snailclimb/JavaGuide
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#2890 fix: 修复图片 alt 引号导致的渲染异常
0 reviews · 10h to merge
#2888 Fix link formatting in Java basic questions document
0 reviews · 17h to merge
#2886 Fix broken links and improve Java JIT compiler documentation
0 reviews · 35h to merge
#2884 Refactor task submission to use execute method
0 reviews · 31h to merge
#2883 docs: 修正不可重复读和幻读概念描述
0 reviews · 48h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 1267 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Snailclimb/JavaGuide weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Snailclimb/JavaGuide — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository