Review economics
Sairyss/domain-driven-hexagon
Read from the 21 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
21
Other PRs
21
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#148 Update of bad link and suggesting new for Hexagonal Architecuture
0 reviews · 2.6d to merge
#146 fix: native crypto import
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#138 replacement of v4() with native function randomUUID
0 reviews · 13h to merge
#112 Fix broken url
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#99 Feat/add graphql adaptaters for finding users
0 reviews · 18h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Sairyss/domain-driven-hexagon weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Sairyss/domain-driven-hexagon — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository