Review economics
RubyMetric/chsrc
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
99
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#373 修复uv换源
1 round · 7 reviews · 2.8d to merge
#372 修复GitHub Copilot的检查说明文件
3 reviews · 14h to merge
#371 更新 TUNA 和 SJTUG 的 PyPI 源地址，添加 USTC 的 PyPI 源
1 reviews · 36h to merge
#366 新增 WoA (Windows ARM64) 支持
1 round · 4 reviews · 42h to merge
#367 fix: correct the outdated speed measure url of Alpine and remove the …
0 reviews · 23h to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 119 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read RubyMetric/chsrc weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on RubyMetric/chsrc — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository