Review economics
NaiboWang/EasySpider
Read from the 46 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
46
Other PRs
46
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#977 fix(ExecuteStage): prevent CWE-95 code injection via Field["x"] templates
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#976 fix(server): restrict CORS and bind local API to loopback (CWE-352)
0 reviews · 8h to merge
#971 修复chrome浏览器中自动化插件加载问题
0 reviews · 13h to merge
#882 Support remote control with backend api
0 reviews · 141.1d to merge
#949 Fix the binary file not found bug when using Docker
1 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read NaiboWang/EasySpider weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on NaiboWang/EasySpider — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository