Review economics
Maciek-roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
Read from the 20 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 2.0× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥12%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
17
Other PRs
20
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#221 v4.0.0 feat: usage ops protocol, trust layer, and warehouse
3 reviews · 5h to merge
#153 Fix: Add missing quotes to pip install
1 reviews · 11.3d to merge
#22 Fix path
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#18 Add package manager & Update build process & Update npm lib process installation
9 reviews · 2.8d to merge
#46 Fix hardcoded reset hours
0 reviews · 6h to merge
How this was measured
12% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Maciek-roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Maciek-roboblog/Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository