Review economics
LaurieWired/GhidraMCP
Read from the 10 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
10
Other PRs
10
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#64 Fixed for Ghidra 11.3.2
0 reviews · 2.3d to merge
#20 ci: Create build workflow
0 reviews · 21.2d to merge
#34 Add cross-reference (xref) functionality and Add functionality to list all defined strings in binaries
0 reviews · 5.1d to merge
#31 Utilize urljoin to gracefully handle variations of server name strings
0 reviews · 7.8d to merge
#17 Improved build instructions
0 reviews · 21.1d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read LaurieWired/GhidraMCP weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on LaurieWired/GhidraMCP — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository