Review economics
Lakr233/Asspp
Read from the 21 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.2× the time to merge of the rest.
≥11%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
18
Other PRs
21
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#61 macOS: fix `LD_RUNPATH_SEARCH_PATHS` in Debug
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#58 Add LookInside debug server
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#57 Fix iOS CI by selecting Xcode 26.2 on macOS 26
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#56 Fix: license hint handling in ProductView to use Hint struct for bett…
1 reviews · 3h to merge
#54 fix device ctl file parameter when sandbox is disabled
0 reviews · 3h to merge
How this was measured
11% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 2 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Lakr233/Asspp weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Lakr233/Asspp — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository