Review economics
Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#3234 IR inliner: Don't use CLI flag that enforces "intra-module" inliner mode
0 reviews · 21h to merge
#3230 Update Kotlin to 2.4
4 reviews · 12.9d to merge
#3225 Improve JSON decoding performance for Okio and kotlinx-io for ASCII
1 round · 11 reviews · 3.2d to merge
#3228 Rename some Json implementation classes
11 reviews · 42h to merge
#3231 KT-87873: suppress warning on android native target family (#3229)
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 806 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Kotlin/kotlinx.serialization — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository