Review economics
Ji4n1ng/OpenInTerminal
Read from the 52 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
51
Other PRs
52
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#237 feat: move menu items to submenu
0 reviews · 431.4d to merge
#261 Add dynamic app icons for Lite apps
0 reviews · 51.5d to merge
#251 Add option to change global keyboard shortcuts to Finder only shortcuts.
0 reviews · 193.1d to merge
#242 Show all supported terminals in OpenInTerminalLite first-launch prompt
0 reviews · 347.6d to merge
#260 Add Ghostty to default terminal options
0 reviews · 87.2d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Ji4n1ng/OpenInTerminal weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Ji4n1ng/OpenInTerminal — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository