Review economics
Homebrew/brew
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#23453 rubocops: adjust `depends_on` checks for Linux
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#23378 workflows/docker: align deprecation of 22.04 image
3 reviews · 1h to merge
#23450 sorbet: Update RBI files.
1 reviews · 1h to merge
#23404 Enforce explicit formula install-step bases (28/29)
2 reviews · 2.2d to merge
#23449 Use `public_send` instead of `send` for public methods
2 reviews · 2h to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 15150 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Homebrew/brew weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Homebrew/brew — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository