Review economics
HeyPuter/puter
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.1× the time to merge of the rest.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
97
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#3508 fix: PUT-1429
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#3504 fix: PUT-1401
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#3505 docs: document the provider option and refresh the vendor list in chat()
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#3506 fix(ai-chat): infron default model is dropped by the aggregator alias rule
0 reviews · 1h to merge
#3500 add limit bypass
0 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 1954 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent, Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read HeyPuter/puter weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on HeyPuter/puter — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository