Review economics
HapeLee/legado-with-MD3
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.2× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥9%
Attributed
a floor
5
Attributed PRs
95
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
The rest — the latest 5
#1972 修复书源校验通知消失的问题，修复锁屏书源校验异常退出的问题，修复书源校验时文字显示不全的问题，修复在书源管理页面进行架构迁移时，遗留的其余问题
0 reviews · 25h to merge
#1959 修复书源页面无障碍相关问题，修复书源 替换规则管理页面底部操作，读屏软件无法聚焦的问题
0 reviews · 3h to merge
#1957 Fix search issue in specified book source management
0 reviews · 5h to merge
#1962 fix: 书架简介显示书源状态面板而非正文
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#1961 fix: 书签跳转位置有误
0 reviews · 2h to merge
How this was measured
9% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 3 PRs came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher; reads 100 of 179 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: OpenAI Codex, Claude Code, Cursor agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read HapeLee/legado-with-MD3 weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on HapeLee/legado-with-MD3 — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository