Review economics

FujiwaraChoki/MoneyPrinterV2

Read from the 22 most recently merged pull requests ·

Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.4× the reviews submitted of the rest.

≥10%

Attributed

a floor

4

Attributed PRs

18

Other PRs

22

Read

Per pull requestAttributedRestRatio
Review rounds0.00.10.0×
Reviews submitted0.30.60.4×
Reverts0.00.0
Time to merge0h18.3d0.0×

How this was measured

10% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.

Detected: Claude Code.

“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits

XLinkedInHacker News
Review tax badge for FujiwaraChoki/MoneyPrinterV2

The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.

Tell me when this moves

We re-read FujiwaraChoki/MoneyPrinterV2 weekly and email only when the number changes materially.

Read your own repos

This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.

npx @ambera/review-tax

Want this continuously on FujiwaraChoki/MoneyPrinterV2 — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge

Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository