Review economics
Flowseal/tg-ws-proxy
Read from the 44 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
1
Attributed PRs
43
Other PRs
44
Read
Attributed — the latest 1
The rest — the latest 5
#1087 Поддержка тестового окружения Telegram (тестовые DC)
3 rounds · 4 reviews · 4.1d to merge
#1025 feature: i18n
1 round · 1 reviews · 26h to merge
#1036 Revert "fix: add WebSocket keepalive pings to prevent idle disconnect…
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#1019 ci: add better view on macos installation
1 round · 2 reviews · 2.7d to merge
#958 Исправлен fallback список CF proxy доменов (добавлена запятая)
0 reviews · 7.6d to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read Flowseal/tg-ws-proxy weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on Flowseal/tg-ws-proxy — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository