Review economics
FiloSottile/age
Read from the 86 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.0× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥2%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
83
Other PRs
86
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#675 doc: fix post-quantum example in age-keygen manpage
0 reviews · 7h to merge
#580 plugin: new framework to implement plugins
2 reviews · 537.9d to merge
#615 Add guix system in installation table
0 reviews · 331.4d to merge
#651 age,cmd/age,tag: implement post-quantum and tagged recipients
7 reviews · 127.8d to merge
#622 .github/workflows: fix actions/setup-go cache
0 reviews · 107.5d to merge
How this was measured
2% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read FiloSottile/age weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on FiloSottile/age — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository