Review economics
DrewThomasson/ebook2audiobook
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took only 0.8× the reviews submitted of the rest.
≥3%
Attributed
a floor
9
Attributed PRs
91
Other PRs
100
Read
Attributed — the latest 5
#2027 [WIP] Fix code based on review comment
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#2023 [WIP] Fix code based on review comments
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#2017 Resolve PR #1996 review-thread regressions in Gradio state restoration and ABS library handling
1 reviews · 0h to merge
#2009 Resolve review-thread regressions in Gradio restore fallbacks and config comment clarity
1 reviews · 23h to merge
#2012 sync from main
1 reviews · 0h to merge
How this was measured
3% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 1303 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
Detected: GitHub Copilot coding agent.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read DrewThomasson/ebook2audiobook weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on DrewThomasson/ebook2audiobook — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository