Review economics
DIYgod/DPlayer
Read from the 100 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
100
Other PRs
100
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#1370 docs: upgrade HTTP image link to HTTPS in README
0 reviews · 2h to merge
#1358 Japanese translation added
0 reviews · 3.2d to merge
#1369 修复了切换清晰度时 hls 等实例不被销毁导致内存泄漏的问题
0 reviews · 2.9d to merge
#1365 更改dashjs调用方式
0 reviews · 9h to merge
#1357 fix(danmaku). animation-name 属性的标准值不应该加引号；
0 reviews · 102.5d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; reads 100 of 377 merged PRs — the rest have not been analyzed yet.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read DIYgod/DPlayer weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on DIYgod/DPlayer — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository