Review economics
D4Vinci/Scrapling
Read from the 99 most recently merged pull requests ·
Pull requests with attributed agent authorship took 1.4× the time to merge of the rest.
≥1%
Attributed
a floor
3
Attributed PRs
96
Other PRs
99
Read
Attributed — the latest 3
The rest — the latest 5
#388 v0.4.12
0 reviews · 0h to merge
#384 ci(docker): tag images with the release version on merge
1 reviews · 40h to merge
#379 fix(spiders): preserve cookies for browser-engine responses in cache
0 reviews · 4.6d to merge
#377 fix: remove dead fetchall() after INSERT and correct retrieve() error message
0 reviews · 8.1d to merge
#378 perf(parser): make get_all_text() O(nodes)
1 reviews · 7.8d to merge
How this was measured
1% of merged commits carry agent attribution — a floor, not the share; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work.
Detected: Claude Code, Google Jules.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read D4Vinci/Scrapling weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on D4Vinci/Scrapling — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository