Review economics
CloakHQ/CloakBrowser
Read from the 49 most recently merged pull requests ·
Not enough merged pull requests on both sides yet to compare how they land in review.
—
Attributed
0
Attributed PRs
49
Other PRs
49
Read
The rest — the latest 5
#482 chore(deps): bump the javascript group across 1 directory with 5 updates
0 reviews · 2.8d to merge
#483 chore(deps): bump the actions group across 1 directory with 4 updates
0 reviews · 2.8d to merge
#470 fix: preserve HTTP proxy credentials during GeoIP resolution
0 reviews · 6h to merge
#440 chore(deps): bump the javascript group across 1 directory with 5 updates
0 reviews · 10.2d to merge
#456 chore(deps): bump the actions group across 1 directory with 7 updates
0 reviews · 3.2d to merge
How this was measured
No commit in this window carries agent attribution, so there is no AI-authored share to read here — which is not evidence there is none; tools that only complete code inline leave no commit trail, so the unattributed side includes AI-assisted work; 1 PR came off an agent branch with no commit attribution, so the real share runs higher.
Detected: OpenAI Codex.
“Attributed” means a commit carried an agent’s signature — a co-author trailer, an agent commit identity, or an agent bot account. Tools that only complete code inline leave no such mark, so the other column is “rest”, not “human-written”. Full method and its limits
The badge reads this repo’s current report, so it follows the number.
Tell me when this moves
We re-read CloakHQ/CloakBrowser weekly and email only when the number changes materially.
Read your own repos
This one is public. For a private repo, run the same read locally through your own GitHub credentials — nothing is installed and nothing is sent to us.
npx @ambera/review-taxWant this continuously on CloakHQ/CloakBrowser — each pull request paired to the task it came from, and the work graded from its review loop rather than its diff size? Claim this repo in Forge
Browse every repo people have read · Read a different repository